SQE1 · Contract · FLK1

Contract terms & their status

Once a contract exists you must identify its terms, whether they were incorporated, and how important each term is. Classifying a term as a condition, warranty or innominate term determines the remedies available for its breach.

What "Contract terms & their status" covers

  • Distinguish terms (part of the contract) from mere representations (inducements) using factors such as importance, timing, and relative expertise.
  • Terms may be incorporated by signature, by reasonable notice given before or at the time of contracting, or by a consistent course of dealing.
  • Terms may be express or implied — implied by fact (business efficacy/officious bystander), by custom, or by statute.
  • The Sale of Goods Act 1979 implies terms as to title, description and satisfactory quality into non-consumer sales of goods (business-to-business and private sales alike); the Consumer Rights Act 2015 governs trader-to-consumer contracts.
  • A condition is a major term whose breach allows termination and damages; a warranty is a minor term giving damages only.
  • An innominate term is classified by the effect of the breach: termination is available only if the breach deprives the innocent party of substantially the whole benefit.
  • A signed document generally binds the signer to its terms even if unread (subject to misrepresentation and unfair-terms controls).

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

L'Estrange v Graucob [1934]Poussard v Spiers (1876)Bettini v Gye (1876)Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki [1962]The Moorcock (1889)ss.12-15 Sale of Goods Act 1979ss.9-11 Consumer Rights Act 2015Oscar Chess v Williams [1957]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For contract terms & their status, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Forcing every term into the condition/warranty dichotomy and ignoring the innominate-term approach.
  • Applying the Sale of Goods Act 1979 to a consumer contract that is now governed by the Consumer Rights Act 2015.
  • Treating a statement as a term when it is only a representation (giving misrepresentation remedies, not breach).

Learn and practise this subtopic

A guided lesson and exam-style questions on contract terms & their status.

FAQ

Is contract terms & their status tested on SQE1?

Yes — contract terms & their status is part of the SQE1 Contract syllabus (FLK1) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is contract terms & their status examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (L'Estrange v Graucob [1934], Poussard v Spiers (1876)) helps.

More Contract subtopics

Join our free SQE community on Discord

Ask questions, swap tips and get help from other SQE1 and SQE2 candidates.

Join the Discord

LearnSQE is independent study material and is not affiliated with, authorised or endorsed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Kaplan or any other body. SQE assessments are set and marked by the SRA and Kaplan. Always confirm the current syllabus, rules, dates and fees on the official SRA SQE website. This guide is provided for revision support and is not legal advice.