SQE1 · Land Law · FLK2

Easements & profits

An easement is a right enjoyed by one piece of land over neighbouring land; a profit à prendre is a right to take something from another's land. Both can be legal or equitable.

What "Easements & profits" covers

  • The four Re Ellenborough Park characteristics: a dominant and servient tenement, the right must accommodate the dominant land, diversity of ownership/occupation, and the right must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant.
  • An easement cannot amount to exclusive or joint occupation of the servient land (Batchelor v Marlow / Moncrieff v Jamieson debate on car parking).
  • Acquisition: express grant/reservation by deed; implied grant (necessity, common intention, the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, or LPA 1925 s.62); or prescription (long use).
  • Wheeldon v Burrows implies into a grant quasi-easements that are continuous and apparent, necessary for reasonable enjoyment, and in use at the date of the transfer.
  • LPA 1925 s.62 can convert a licence or precarious right into an easement on a conveyance where there was prior diversity of occupation.
  • Prescription requires use as of right (nec vi, nec clam, nec precario) for the period — common law, lost modern grant, or the Prescription Act 1832.
  • A legal easement in registered land granted after first registration must be registered (LRA 2002 s.27); certain impliedly created easements can be overriding under Sch 3 para 3.

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

Re Ellenborough Park [1956]LPA 1925 s.62Wheeldon v Burrows (1879)Prescription Act 1832LRA 2002 s.27LRA 2002 Sch 3 para 3Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007]Regency Villas v Diamond Resorts [2018]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For easements & profits, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Claiming an easement where the dominant and servient land are in common ownership and occupation.
  • Confusing the Wheeldon v Burrows conditions with the operation of LPA 1925 s.62.
  • Overlooking that a right amounting to exclusive possession cannot be an easement.

Learn and practise this subtopic

A guided lesson and exam-style questions on easements & profits.

FAQ

Is easements & profits tested on SQE1?

Yes — easements & profits is part of the SQE1 Land Law syllabus (FLK2) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is easements & profits examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (Re Ellenborough Park [1956], LPA 1925 s.62) helps.

More Land Law subtopics

Join our free SQE community on Discord

Ask questions, swap tips and get help from other SQE1 and SQE2 candidates.

Join the Discord

LearnSQE is independent study material and is not affiliated with, authorised or endorsed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Kaplan or any other body. SQE assessments are set and marked by the SRA and Kaplan. Always confirm the current syllabus, rules, dates and fees on the official SRA SQE website. This guide is provided for revision support and is not legal advice.