SQE1 · Land Law · FLK2

Easements & profits

An easement is a right enjoyed by one piece of land over neighbouring land; a profit à prendre is a right to take something from another's land. Both can be legal or equitable.

What "Easements & profits" covers

  • The four Re Ellenborough Park characteristics: a dominant and servient tenement, the right must accommodate the dominant land, diversity of ownership/occupation, and the right must be capable of forming the subject matter of a grant.
  • An easement cannot amount to exclusive or joint occupation of the servient land (Batchelor v Marlow / Moncrieff v Jamieson debate on car parking).
  • Acquisition: express grant/reservation by deed; implied grant (necessity, common intention, the rule in Wheeldon v Burrows, or LPA 1925 s.62); or prescription (long use).
  • Wheeldon v Burrows implies into a grant quasi-easements that are continuous and apparent, necessary for reasonable enjoyment, and in use at the date of the transfer.
  • LPA 1925 s.62 can convert a licence or precarious right into an easement on a conveyance where there was prior diversity of occupation.
  • Prescription requires use as of right (nec vi, nec clam, nec precario) for the period — common law, lost modern grant, or the Prescription Act 1832.
  • A legal easement in registered land granted after first registration must be registered (LRA 2002 s.27); certain impliedly created easements can be overriding under Sch 3 para 3.

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

Re Ellenborough Park [1956]LPA 1925 s.62Wheeldon v Burrows (1879)Prescription Act 1832LRA 2002 s.27LRA 2002 Sch 3 para 3Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007]Regency Villas v Diamond Resorts [2018]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For easements & profits, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Claiming an easement where the dominant and servient land are in common ownership and occupation.
  • Confusing the Wheeldon v Burrows conditions with the operation of LPA 1925 s.62.
  • Overlooking that a right amounting to exclusive possession cannot be an easement.

Learn this subtopic in the course

A video lesson, notes and exam-style practice on easements & profits.

FAQ

Is easements & profits tested on SQE1?

Yes — easements & profits is part of the SQE1 Land Law syllabus (FLK2) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is easements & profits examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (Re Ellenborough Park [1956], LPA 1925 s.62) helps.

More Land Law subtopics