SQE1 · Tort · FLK1

Negligence: duty of care

The duty of care is the first element of negligence and asks whether the defendant owed the claimant a legal obligation to take reasonable care. SQE1 expects you to apply the modern incremental approach rather than mechanically running the Caparo test.

What "Negligence: duty of care" covers

  • In established categories (e.g. road users, doctor and patient, manufacturer and consumer) a duty is assumed and need not be re-argued.
  • For novel situations the court reasons incrementally by analogy, and where guidance is needed applies foreseeability, proximity, and whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty (Caparo).
  • Robinson confirmed Caparo is not a universal test to be applied in every case; established duties come first.
  • There is generally no duty for pure omissions or to prevent third parties causing harm, subject to exceptions (assumption of responsibility, control, creating the danger).
  • Public bodies are analysed on ordinary negligence principles (Robinson), not a blanket policy immunity: they are generally not liable for a mere failure to protect a claimant from the acts of third parties (Hill, Michael), absent an assumption of responsibility or a recognised exception.
  • Manufacturers owe a duty to the ultimate consumer of their products (Donoghue v Stevenson).
  • A duty of care can arise from an assumption of responsibility toward a specific claimant.

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990]Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018]Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co [1970]Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989]Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For negligence: duty of care, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Running the full Caparo three-stage test where an established duty category already governs.
  • Assuming liability for omissions or for the acts of third parties without an applicable exception.
  • Treating public bodies as owing the same duties as private defendants.

Learn and practise this subtopic

A guided lesson and exam-style questions on negligence: duty of care.

FAQ

Is negligence: duty of care tested on SQE1?

Yes — negligence: duty of care is part of the SQE1 Tort syllabus (FLK1) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is negligence: duty of care examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (Donoghue v Stevenson [1932], Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990]) helps.

More Tort subtopics

Join our free SQE community on Discord

Ask questions, swap tips and get help from other SQE1 and SQE2 candidates.

Join the Discord

LearnSQE is independent study material and is not affiliated with, authorised or endorsed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Kaplan or any other body. SQE assessments are set and marked by the SRA and Kaplan. Always confirm the current syllabus, rules, dates and fees on the official SRA SQE website. This guide is provided for revision support and is not legal advice.