SQE1 · Tort · FLK1

Negligence: duty of care

The duty of care is the first element of negligence and asks whether the defendant owed the claimant a legal obligation to take reasonable care. SQE1 expects you to apply the modern incremental approach rather than mechanically running the Caparo test.

What "Negligence: duty of care" covers

  • In established categories (e.g. road users, doctor and patient, manufacturer and consumer) a duty is assumed and need not be re-argued.
  • For novel situations the court reasons incrementally by analogy, and where guidance is needed applies foreseeability, proximity, and whether it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty (Caparo).
  • Robinson confirmed Caparo is not a universal test to be applied in every case; established duties come first.
  • There is generally no duty for pure omissions or to prevent third parties causing harm, subject to exceptions (assumption of responsibility, control, creating the danger).
  • Public bodies are analysed on ordinary negligence principles (Robinson), not a blanket policy immunity: they are generally not liable for a mere failure to protect a claimant from the acts of third parties (Hill, Michael), absent an assumption of responsibility or a recognised exception.
  • Manufacturers owe a duty to the ultimate consumer of their products (Donoghue v Stevenson).
  • A duty of care can arise from an assumption of responsibility toward a specific claimant.

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990]Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018]Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co [1970]Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989]Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For negligence: duty of care, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Running the full Caparo three-stage test where an established duty category already governs.
  • Assuming liability for omissions or for the acts of third parties without an applicable exception.
  • Treating public bodies as owing the same duties as private defendants.

Learn this subtopic in the course

A video lesson, notes and exam-style practice on negligence: duty of care.

FAQ

Is negligence: duty of care tested on SQE1?

Yes — negligence: duty of care is part of the SQE1 Tort syllabus (FLK1) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is negligence: duty of care examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (Donoghue v Stevenson [1932], Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990]) helps.

More Tort subtopics