SQE1 · Contract · FLK1

Breach & termination

Breach occurs when a party fails to perform an obligation, and only some breaches allow the innocent party to terminate. Distinguishing repudiatory and anticipatory breach, and the choice to affirm or terminate, is central to the topic.

What "Breach & termination" covers

  • A breach is repudiatory where it is a breach of condition, a sufficiently serious breach of an innominate term, or a renunciation of the contract.
  • Anticipatory breach arises where a party indicates before performance is due that it will not perform, allowing the innocent party to sue at once.
  • Faced with a repudiatory breach the innocent party may either affirm the contract (keeping it alive for both) or accept the repudiation and terminate.
  • Termination must be communicated, though in limited cases conduct can suffice (The Santa Clara).
  • On affirmation the innocent party loses the right to terminate for that breach and remains bound to perform.
  • A party who terminates for a breach that was not in fact repudiatory itself commits a wrongful repudiation.
  • In some circumstances the innocent party can perform and claim the price rather than mitigate (White & Carter), subject to a legitimate interest.

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

Hochster v De La Tour (1853)White & Carter (Councils) v McGregor [1962]Hong Kong Fir Shipping v Kawasaki [1962]Photo Production v Securicor [1980]Vitol v Norelf (The Santa Clara) [1996]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For breach & termination, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Purporting to terminate for a breach of warranty, which only gives damages, and thereby repudiating oneself.
  • Forgetting that acceptance of a repudiation must generally be communicated to the party in breach.
  • Assuming a party can terminate after affirming — affirmation is an irrevocable election.

Learn this subtopic in the course

A video lesson, notes and exam-style practice on breach & termination.

FAQ

Is breach & termination tested on SQE1?

Yes — breach & termination is part of the SQE1 Contract syllabus (FLK1) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is breach & termination examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (Hochster v De La Tour (1853), White & Carter (Councils) v McGregor [1962]) helps.

More Contract subtopics