SQE1 · Trusts · FLK2

Breach of trust & remedies

A breach of trust is a failure by a trustee to carry out their duties. Beneficiaries have a range of personal and proprietary remedies.

What "Breach of trust & remedies" covers

  • A trustee in breach is personally liable to restore the trust fund (equitable compensation); causation is assessed on a 'but for' basis judged at the date of judgment (Target Holdings v Redferns; AIB v Redler).
  • Liability is generally for the loss caused by the breach; trustees are not insurers of the fund where loss would have occurred anyway.
  • Trustees are liable jointly and severally; a trustee who pays may seek contribution from co-trustees (Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978).
  • Defences: an exemption clause (valid even for gross negligence but not fraud — Armitage v Nurse), consent/acquiescence by a fully-informed beneficiary, and the court's power to relieve where the trustee acted honestly and reasonably (Trustee Act 1925 s.61).
  • Limitation: generally six years (Limitation Act 1980 s.21(3)), but no limitation period for fraudulent breach or recovery of trust property still in the trustee's hands (s.21(1)).
  • Proprietary remedies allow the beneficiary to recover the trust property or its traceable proceeds and to take any increase in value.
  • Personal claims may also lie against knowing recipients and dishonest assistants (third-party liability).

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

Target Holdings v Redferns [1996]AIB Group v Mark Redler [2014]Armitage v Nurse [1998]Trustee Act 1925 s.61Limitation Act 1980 s.21Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978Nestle v National Westminster Bank [1993]Bartlett v Barclays Bank [1980]

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For breach of trust & remedies, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Assuming any breach makes the trustee liable for all subsequent loss regardless of causation.
  • Thinking an exemption clause can excuse actual fraud or dishonesty — Armitage v Nurse limits it to short of fraud.
  • Applying the six-year limitation period to a fraudulent breach or to trust property retained by the trustee.

Learn and practise this subtopic

A guided lesson and exam-style questions on breach of trust & remedies.

FAQ

Is breach of trust & remedies tested on SQE1?

Yes — breach of trust & remedies is part of the SQE1 Trusts syllabus (FLK2) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is breach of trust & remedies examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (Target Holdings v Redferns [1996], AIB Group v Mark Redler [2014]) helps.

More Trusts subtopics

Join our free SQE community on Discord

Ask questions, swap tips and get help from other SQE1 and SQE2 candidates.

Join the Discord

LearnSQE is independent study material and is not affiliated with, authorised or endorsed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Kaplan or any other body. SQE assessments are set and marked by the SRA and Kaplan. Always confirm the current syllabus, rules, dates and fees on the official SRA SQE website. This guide is provided for revision support and is not legal advice.