SQE1 · Trusts · FLK2

Formalities & constitution

Formalities are the writing and signature requirements for certain trusts; constitution is the transfer of the trust property to the trustees. A trust must be properly declared and completely constituted to be enforceable.

What "Formalities & constitution" covers

  • A declaration of trust respecting land must be manifested and proved by signed writing (LPA 1925 s.53(1)(b)); the writing is evidential and may post-date the declaration.
  • A disposition of a subsisting equitable interest must itself be in signed writing (LPA 1925 s.53(1)(c)) — Grey v IRC; Vandervell v IRC.
  • Constitution of a trust of a legal estate requires the correct method of transfer to the trustee (Milroy v Lord): e.g. a deed and registration for land, share transfer form and registration for shares.
  • Equity will not perfect an imperfect gift and will not assist a volunteer; an incompletely constituted trust of which the intended beneficiary gave no consideration is generally unenforceable.
  • Exceptions where equity intervenes: the 'every effort' rule (Re Rose), the rule in Strong v Bird, donatio mortis causa, and unconscionability (Pennington v Waine).
  • A self-declaration of trust needs no transfer — the settlor already holds the property — but must be a present, binding declaration, not a failed gift (Jones v Lock).
  • Testamentary trusts must comply with the Wills Act 1837 s.9 (writing, signature, two witnesses).

Key cases & statutes

The authorities and provisions most likely to matter for this subtopic:

LPA 1925 s.53(1)(b)LPA 1925 s.53(1)(c)Milroy v Lord (1862)Re Rose [1952]Strong v Bird (1874)Pennington v Waine [2002]Grey v IRC [1960]Wills Act 1837 s.9

How it's tested in SQE1

SQE1 uses single best answer questions: a short factual scenario, one precise question, and five options of which only one is the best answer on the law applied to the facts. For formalities & constitution, expect to be asked what the correct legal position is, what a party may or must do, or which outcome follows — with more than one option looking arguable. Reading the facts carefully and eliminating the near-misses is the skill that earns the mark.

Where candidates lose marks

  • Confusing s.53(1)(b) (declaration of trust of land — evidential writing) with s.53(1)(c) (disposition of an equitable interest — writing required for validity).
  • Trying to save a failed outright gift by reinterpreting it as a self-declaration of trust (Jones v Lock).
  • Overlooking that s.53(2) exempts resulting, implied and constructive trusts from the writing formalities.

Learn and practise this subtopic

A guided lesson and exam-style questions on formalities & constitution.

FAQ

Is formalities & constitution tested on SQE1?

Yes — formalities & constitution is part of the SQE1 Trusts syllabus (FLK2) and can appear in single best answer questions.

How is formalities & constitution examined in SQE1?

SQE1 tests it by application: you're given a realistic scenario and choose the single best answer from five options. The focus is on using the law correctly, not reciting it — knowing the leading authorities (LPA 1925 s.53(1)(b), LPA 1925 s.53(1)(c)) helps.

More Trusts subtopics

Join our free SQE community on Discord

Ask questions, swap tips and get help from other SQE1 and SQE2 candidates.

Join the Discord

LearnSQE is independent study material and is not affiliated with, authorised or endorsed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Kaplan or any other body. SQE assessments are set and marked by the SRA and Kaplan. Always confirm the current syllabus, rules, dates and fees on the official SRA SQE website. This guide is provided for revision support and is not legal advice.